NCI Data Jamboree (Project Abstract Submission): Submission #56

Submission information
Submission Number: 56
Submission ID: 189173
Submission UUID: 74a44216-cfbe-430f-976f-21c095fad071

Created: Mon, 07/27/2026 - 16:49
Completed: Mon, 07/27/2026 - 16:50
Changed: Mon, 07/27/2026 - 16:50

Remote IP address: 10.208.28.116
Submitted by: Anonymous
Language: English

Is draft: No
Presenter Information
Nora
L.
Nock
Ph.D., MS, BS, PE, FSBM
Professor
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland
Additional Authors
  • First Name: Mireya
    Last Name: Diaz-Insua
    Post-nominal letters: PhD
    Affiliation: Case Western Reserve University
  • First Name: Siran
    Last Name: Koroukian
    Post-nominal letters: PhD
    Affiliation: Case Western Reserve University
  • First Name: Johnie
    Last Name: Rose
    Post-nominal letters: MD, PhD
    Affiliation: Case Western Reserve University
Abstract Information
Evaluating data quality for reproducibility and AI-readiness
AI, qualitative data, lived experience, interviews, focus groups
Leveraging AI to Augment Human Expertise and Enhance Efficiency in Synthesizing and Analyzing Lived Experience Qualitative Data in Cancer Research
Lived experience obtained from cancer patients, caregivers, families and providers can help integrate cultural context, optimize intervention design, improve clinical outcomes and better understand attitudes, barriers and facilitators to widespread dissemination and implementation efforts. The increased use of qualitative methods in cancer research has created an imminent need to develop more standardized workflows and methods to comprehensively and efficiently synthesize and analyze qualitative data. Leveraging AI to synthesize lived experience qualitative data may help improve efficiency in the arduous and time consuming process of coding and thematic analyses and, potentially uncover new insights not initially observed. We propose to synthesize existing guidebooks and raw transcript text data from interviews and focus groups in cancer patients obtained from multiple sources such as published manuscript supplemental files, National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers patient “story” webpages, and other open access platforms with relevant transcript and guidebook data. We propose to use widely available AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude) as well as more sophisticated “deep” AI tools (e.g., BERT/BERT-Like) to synthesize transcript data, interview and focus group guides, create codebooks and conduct thematic analyses. We propose to evaluate performance using several measures including but not limited to accuracy and reliability/agreement in revealing codes, subcategories and themes compared to those derived from human experts, reflecting readability, lexical diversity, and coherence. We may also explore utilizing different command prompts from prompt engineering frameworks (e.g., RISEN: Role, Instructions, Steps, End Goal, and Narrowing) if time permits. We hypothesize that human interaction and expert oversight will be needed to add cultural context, judgement, and ethical responsibility. We have assembled a team with expertise in qualitative and mixed methods in cancer research, biostatistics, general AI and large databases but would be interested in having additional member(s), particularly those with advanced/deep AI tool expertise, join our team.