cct-traco (Evaluation) | Events Registration

Center for Cancer Training Translational Research in Clinical Oncology

TRACO Course Evaluation

In order to improve TRACO in future years we would appreciate your feedback on the following course evaluation. Please rank questions (1-29) on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent. Please type any comments that you have on questions (30-32).

Questions	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
1. Overall evaluation of course	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
2. Course coordination	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
3. WEBEX	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
4. “Introduction” Moody	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
5. ”Cervical cancer” Schiller	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
6. “Global health” Gopal	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
7. “Prostate cancer” Madan	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
8. “Ovarian cancer” Annunziata	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
9. “Immune checkpoints” Goff	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
10. “Small molecules” Simeonov	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
11. “Clinical trials” Smith	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
12. “Radiation oncology” Nichols	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
13. “Tumor imaging” Choyke	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
14. “COVID19 and cancer” Dahut	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
15. “Cannabis and cancer” Freedman	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
16. “Genomics” Wei	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
17. “CAR T-cells” Mikkelneni	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
18. ”Breast cancer”, Zia	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
19. “SCLC” Chen	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
20. “K-RAS” Luo	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
21. “Brain cancer” Timmer	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
22. “NSCLC” Szabo	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
23. "HIV" Maldarelli	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
24. “Epigenetics” Verma	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
25. “Case reports” Olaku	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
26. Precision medicine” Harris	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
27. “Topoisomerase” Pommier	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
28. “Pancreatic cancer”, Hussain	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)
29. “Nanotechnology” Dobrovolskaia	1 (Poor)	2	3	4	5 (Excellent)

PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS ON QUESTIONS 30-32.

30. What were the strengths of the course?

31. What were the weaknesses of the course?

32. Suggestions for improvement or other comments.